JD Vance rips into Europe again as he gives 'nuclear attack' reason for Greenland takeover



The Trump administration has repeatedly emphasized that Greenland, the world’s largest island and a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, is strategically vital to the United States’ national security.

Speaking to Fox News, U.S. Vice President JD Vance argued that Greenland is integral to missile defense infrastructure. He claimed that in the unlikely event of a nuclear strike on North America or Europe, Greenland serves as a key anchor for defense systems designed to detect and intercept such threats. Vance criticized Europe and Denmark for what he described as insufficient efforts to secure Greenland. He said:


“People do not realize that the entire missile defense infrastructure is partially dependent on Greenland. If God forbid the Russians or the Chinese though we are not saying they would launched a nuclear missile at our continent or at Europe, Greenland is a critical part of missile defense. Have the Europeans or the Danes done a proper job of securing Greenland? The answer is obviously no.”

The Trump administration has even gone so far as to consider acquiring Greenland. According to a White House statement shared with Reuters, President Trump views the island as a national security priority to deter adversaries in the Arctic. The statement read:


“President Trump has made it well known that acquiring Greenland is a national security priority of the United States. The president and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this foreign policy goal, and of course, utilizing the U.S. military is always an option at the commander-in-chief's disposal.”

This focus on Greenland reflects a broader pattern of criticism from U.S. officials toward Europe. Last year, Vice President Vance urged European countries at the Munich Security Conference to take greater responsibility for their own defense. He also criticized EU governments for allegedly undermining free speech and failing to address migration concerns, suggesting that European “commissars” were retreating from core democratic values.

In short, the Trump administration frames Greenland not just as a geographic asset, but as a linchpin in global security strategy a perspective that has fueled calls for closer U.S. oversight and even consideration of annexation.

Comments